On Web 2.0 Presentation Technologies [Module 9]

March 10, 2014 § Leave a comment

This post will discuss three Web 2.0 presentation technologies, as well as their pros, cons, and possible uses in the classroom.


Slideshare is a platform for publishing Powerpoint presentations. Users can browse through topics, upload their own presentations, and create mash-ups of existing works (with proper citation). Users can also communicate and collaborate on shared projects.


  • If you are looking for inspiration, you’ll probably find it on Slideshare. You can access hundreds of topics via the “search” bar at the top of the page. More suggestions are available to the right-hand side of the presentation you’re engaged with.


  • Monotony. There’s a reason (actually, many) why the Anti-Powerpoint Party exists, and you’ll catch on to most of them when you browse Slideshare. Many of the Powerpoint presentations I came across were dull. Informative, but dull. They relied too heavily on text. Remember, Powerpoint is a visual medium!(!!) If you feel the need to give your students text, opt for books or hand outs. (Granted, some text-heavy presentations, such as this one on contemporary poetry, tinkered around with space, word size, and tone, which made for a more entertaining experience.)

That said, I did encounter quite a few interactive presentations. I particularly liked this Powerpoint, a good ol’ Jeopardy review game about The Canterbury Tales. Why I liked it goes without saying. Make learning competitive and interactive, and you’ll have a classroom of reasonably engaged students. (Not that you really really need a game to make The Canterbury Tales exciting. Get past the weird middle English, and you’ll find that Chaucer was way ahead of his time — and waaay bawdy. But I digress.) Chaucer is also studied widely by high school students, so a Jeopardy game over this topic would be pertinent to some of the high school English language arts classes I will teach.

Where there are pros, there are cons. Visually, this presentation hasn’t aged well. If I were to use it in a classroom, I would most likely make a new, cleaner presentation in Powerpoint ’07 or ’10 and cite the Chaucer game at the end. I’ve noticed this tendency toward Jeopardy overkill, too. Unless the students really enjoy Jeopardy, I wouldn’t conclude every unit or lesson with it. (I tried to search for “interactive Powerpoint games” in Slideshare, but I didn’t get any results that weren’t Jeopardy or Jeopardy knock-offs. Hmm. Perhaps there are more options on the website. It’s entirely possible that my search terms weren’t precise enough.)


VoiceThread provides a platform that encourages discussion and collaboration through the simulation of live presence. Users upload their files (pictures, films, documents, etc.) and create audio, video, or textual commentary, to which other users can respond in the same ways. The result is an asynchronous but lively discussion forum: users experience voices, expressions, and the nuances of actual speech.


  • Engagement. Yes, speech is indeed more nuanced than text. Simultaneously watching a face, analyzing expressions, and recognizing tones of speech is a much more involved process than simply reading text. In-class discussions extend beyond the period. Students are given the chance to experiment with ideas in an informal (but still monitored) environment.
  • Personalization. Students can personalize their documents by video doodling, as well as by adding commentary. They take charge of the learning process by explaining things in their own words, with their own expressions. Students can also choose how they want to participate in forums. More reserved students may choose text — or, because they are not forced to speak in front of twenty people at once, they may choose to upload an audio or video response.
  • User-friendly. Tutorials are available, which is quite handy if you’re a technological n00b like me.


  • Some may take issue with younger students disclosing their identities or posting their pictures online. Thankfully, user avatars need not be the users’ actual faces.

I admit, I admire VoiceThread more than SlideShare because it offers a truly multimedia, interactive experience. Teachers can create portfolios of classroom work for parent-teacher conferences or for reward or motivation. (The cat poetry example is a bit juvenile for high school, but (a) it’s darn cute, and (b) it’s a clever way of getting internet-savvy students to write. Social media can provide great inspiration for creative writing in all grades, so long as teachers show students how to surf and cite responsibly. Online portfolios are also a splendid means of showcasing student work and setting up a supportive classroom environment.)

VoiceThread offers a dynamic platform for peer revision, as exemplified here. Again: darn cute. And the concept would likely work in high school classes. As students complete formative writing assessments, they can post their drafts online (perhaps as a PDF file) and receive feedback from peers. The peer revision process does not stop when class ends. Students are free to communicate with their partners whenever they have time.


Imagine Powerpoint. (I know you don’t want to, but do it.) Now imagine Powerpoint’s cooler, hipper, beard-and-beanie-wearing half-sibling twice-removed, and you have Prezi.

Prezi is a platform that allows users to create attractive, nonlinear presentations. Users can choose from various templates, then populate them with items of their choosing — pictures, text, hyperlinks, videos, audio, and so on. Items can then be connected via a path drawn by the user.


  • User friendly. Prezi offers some practical tutorials for teachers and older students.
  • Engaging. The nonlinear paths between items make for a dynamic presentation. (For a cool example that’s also slightly disorienting, please refer to this ELA Prezi.) Users can also tinker around with more objects and special effects than in Powerpoint.
  • Visually appealing. The templates are clean and attractively colored. Users can follow principles of visual design as they freely add, rotate, and connect objects.
  • Shareable. Many Prezis are “public and reusable,” which permits open use.


  • Younger students may have more difficulty creating presentations on this interface. I say this tentatively, however, because even elementary school students are now digital natives.

I particularly liked this Prezi, a timeline that features famous African-American authors and their works. Students travel along with the timeline — a much more involving experience than observing the linear path of a similar Powerpoint presentation. Timelines make fantastic accompaniments for literature, as so many creative works, although seen primarily as individual artistic expression, are also products of historical, social, and economic contexts. I would certainly use a similar presentation in my future English classes.

That said, however, I would also be sure to compliment a timeline with a more multimedia Prezi. Audio and video would do much to further enhance students’ understanding of art, literature, and society.


Where Am I?

You are currently browsing entries tagged with slideshare at Teach/Learn.